Maytag’s Brand Blunder (a focus group of one)

FacebookLinkedInTwitter

You’d be hard-pressed to find an icon more closely associated with a consumer product than The Lonely Repairman and Maytag (NYSE: WHR) appliances. For 40+ years the character created by Leo Burnett idled away his hours as Maytag washers and dryers operated flawlessly.

This unequivocal assertion of value: Maytag = Dependability, effectively depositioned the competition, helped the brand command a substantial price premium, and drove clear preference at the higher end of the “white goods” market for decades. In fidelity to this brand promise, Maytag even had the town of Newton, Iowa change the name of its headquarters address to “One Dependability Square.”

The simplicity, focus and lasting resonance of Maytag’s brand positioning is a brand-builder’s dream . . . except when the brand experience fails to deliver. And that’s just what happened to BrandCultureTalk on Christmas Eve when a 2.5 year old Maytag Neptune washing machine refused to wash. It refused to tumble. Refused to spin. It did, however fill up with water, transforming dirty clothes into a sad, soggy ball.

We called Maytag’s “Priority One” service on December 26th with high hopes. After all, the name and exclusive customer service line denoted our importance to Maytag. After 20+ minutes on hold (but presumably ahead of all Priority Two callers), we spoke to a very polite and sympathetic representative who reminded us that the washer’s one-year warranty had expired, but A&E Factory Service would surely be able to address the problem.

Alas, the Maytag repairman isn’t quite so lonely these days. He could offer no greater precision than a five hour range of when he would show up (perhaps A&E shares a common ownership with cable TV installers?). Four hours and sixteen minutes into the five hour wait, the repairman arrived. After another twenty minutes he announced that the problem was . . . a stripped bolt! Not just any bolt, but a super-duper special rare bolt that would take 7 – 14 days to arrive, after which time he would provide another five hour arrival window and install it for $188.61, brand new bolt included.

Extrapolating overall brand performance assessment from personal experience is admittedly dangerous. But at each service touchpoint when the product fails – from the paltry Maytag one-year warranty through inconvenient repair scheduling to confiscatory pricing – the Maytag brand promise has diverged from the actual Maytag brand experience. And BrandCultureTalk Blog’s experience is by no means unique. See Exhibit 1, Exhibit 2, and Exhibit 3.

Contrast this with BrandCultureTalk’s recent experience with a failed twelve-year-old Grohe faucet. Unlike Maytag, Grohe doesn’t position its brand around reliability, but around functionality and aesthetics. Grohe, however, quietly backs its products with a lifetime warranty. If a Grohe faucet breaks, Grohe will fix it or give you a new faucet. It’s a premium product supported by a premium brand experience above and beyond reasonable expectations. Sure it’s expensive, but Grohe commands a premium for its faucets in the same way Maytag commands a premium for its appliances.

Whirlpool acquired Maytag in 2006, and even before the sale, Maytag was attempting to migrate the Maytag brand away from exclusive associations with reliability.

But given Old Lonely’s significance in the national Zeitgeist, redefining the Maytag brand will be no mean feat. We’ve said before that great brands make tough choices. (Lest we be accused of picking on Whirlpool, recall our encomium last year to the KitchenAid mixer, also owned by Whirlpool). If it wishes Maytag to remain a strong brand, Whirlpool needs to choose to deliver a brand experience consistent with the promise of quality for which it has stood for decades.

Now It’s Your Turn
FacebookLinkedInTwitter
Show all responses
  • Holiday story
    Jan 10, 2009

    What a sad holiday tale. This is where I think Apple excels with their genius bars and Applecare. Their support is actually helpful and relatively quick. Or, at least, they appear to care about customer service and customer experience after purchase.

  • Gamelda Narkosky
    Jan 12, 2009

    A sad holiday tale indeed. However, even I, who am not really up on what’s good and what’s bad knew that Maytag brand was not what it was in the last century. Just as it is with automobiles, the repairmen of computerized objects must learn new skills. What is abominable is the repair people, like doctors, make the consumer sit around for hours and usually don’t show up until the end of the time window. I would like to hear from people who get repair people who come at the beginning of the time allotment. I’ve never met one. I do hope the blogger gets the necessary repair. The account is heartrending and shows admirable restraint on a highly charged subject.

  • Norman Farrell
    Mar 5, 2010

    Frederick Maytag founded a company that concentrated on building a narrow line of durable machines. It led the industry in financial performance and customer satisfaction for decades but lost sight of why it was successful. After 112 years, the remnants were worth little and the Maytag example is not unusual.

    Modern executives are captured by the tyranny of quarterly reports. Short-termism leads to sacrificing long term strategies for immediate profit results. A company loses loyalty to itself, forgets its purpose and its expertise. Arrogance, carelessness, greed and other factors contribute.

    Another business I intend to watch is Red Wing Shoe Co., a Minnesota based company that began selling high quality work boots and shoes in 1905. Until recent years, they proudly offered only U.S. made footwear. It was premium priced but premium quality product. Now, much of what they sell is made in China and while it still carries high prices, product quality is reduced.

    The full story here:

    http://northerninsights.blogspot.com/2010/03/when-did-someone-last-spin-story-about.html

4 Trackbacks

Employer Branding
Curating a Great Physical
Work Environment:
One Size Does Not Fit All

It’s no secret that the physical environment of an office has a profound impact on the way people work. When we think of “bad” environments, visions of gray, bland cubicles and fluorescent lights immediately jump to the forefront of what companies need to avoid. But ripping out cubicles alone doesn’t solve the problem. Open spaces […]

Learn More
Brand Architecture, Corporate Culture, Employee Engagement
Employee Experience: Future Proofing the Workplace of Tomorrow

The definition of “career” continues to morph and evolve in the unpredictable and ever-changing business world of today. Organizations must embrace agility, innovation and speed or risk extinction. One emerging practice leading to sustainable competitive advantage puts Employee Experience (EX) at the center. As businesses have moved from a product focus to a customer focus […]

Learn More
Brand Strategy, Corporate Culture, Employer Branding
Employee Brand Experience: An Extension of Shared Purpose

Workplaces have never been more diverse. This heterogeneity brings a welcome and necessary diversity of skills, perspectives and dispositions that defy groupthink and yield more resilient results. But diversity can create friction. Yankees vs. Red Socks fans. Extroverts vs. Introverts. EDM vs. Country music. Baby Boomers vs. Millennials. Android vs. iPhone. Blue, Red and Purple […]

Learn More
Corporate Culture, Employee Engagement
Culture Framework Part 1: Communications | Hitting the Mark at Target

The foundation of building company culture begins with communication. Not one way communications from the company to the employees, but a two-way flow of information and ideas. Communications set expectations and memorialize shared goals. They lay the foundation to resolve problems and announce strategies, actions and achievements. The voice of a company comes alive in […]

Learn More

Ready to talk about how your brand and culture can do more for your business?

Let's talk