Logo Madness: Plagiarism, Personality and Simplicity

Logo Madness: Plagiarism, Personality and Simplicity

FacebookLinkedInTwitter

5167

The past fortnight has brought some boffo changes to the world of global logos and corporate identity systems. First, the 2020 Olympic committee decided to jettison their fairly distinctive logo for, well not being distinctive enough and subject to accusations of plagiarism. Then there were the rebranding efforts of two of the largest and most high profile organizations in country, Verizon and Google. As much as each is significant in its own right, they all present a lesson or two in modern branding.

Beginning with the Olympic logo, you have to feel some sympathy for the designer, assuming that nothing was actually plagiarized (and as of this writing no evidence has turned up that would support such a claim). As our design team points out, the would-have-been 2020 Olympic logo uses basic forms and shapes common across many visual systems. Given that it is impossible to check all logos, especially obscure ones from halfway around the planet, how much “blame” can really be leveled at the designer? Indeed, it gets at the heart of what constitutes originality. Take, for instance, the 1992 and the 2000 Olympic logos. They share a large number of elements—from color to form. Obviously the 2000 creator knew of the 1992 logo. Should we then also refer to the 2000 logo as a copy?

It seems that the question of what constitutes original work could become an even thornier issue in the coming years. This brings us to the next logo—Verizon. Verizon is just the latest of an endless parade of corporations “simplifying” their logos to make it as “clean” as possible. What this means in practice is that more and more corporate identities are so “simple” that they have become simplistic with little to no distinguishing elements, making them, as we argued last year, homogenous “little boxes on the hillside.” We look forward to the time when this simplicity-to-the-point-of-simplistic logo design trend runs its course, just as the trend of including swoosh-like forms to ride the coattails of Nike’s success did in the 1980s and 90s.

OlgXtsvw4y

Google’s new logo, while admittedly simple, has some color and personality. In fact, it’s so friendly we would have liked to have invited it over for a Labor Day BBQ, if Google weren’t an incorporeal entity, that is. We suspect that the disarming friendliness and approachability of the new Google logo is in fact a masterstroke as the search behemoth approaches total monopolistic domination with its current accelerating 67% desktop and 83% mobile search market share. And this brings us to the final lesson. While “simplicity” and “cleanliness” may look slick on the corner of a webpage, it’s the expression of a brand’s personality that should always be at the heart of a logo. Or, perhaps in Google’s case, the personality they want to project to the world. There is no cold, calculating simplicity for Google, what with their slanted “e” at the end. It’s sort of like the logo equivalent of a wink, even though the joke may be on us. They’ve got a personality so cute and cuddly that we would never be nervous about handing over our most sensitive personal data to them to unleash precisely targeted offers to buy more stuff that we will be powerless to resist. If we think of it in terms of economic stimulus vs. ensuing default, now that’s a brand friend we can trust.

Now It’s Your Turn
FacebookLinkedInTwitter

Brand Strategy, Corporate Culture, Culture, Employee Engagement, Organizational Development
The Southwest Airlines Meltdown: When a Strong Brand is Humbled by Weak Systems

An unfortunate number of Americans will remember the Great Travel Debacle of the 2022 Christmas travel season. A once-in-a-century storm swept the nation coast-to-coast causing untold misery for thousands of travelers and effectively canceled the holidays for many. While most airlines were able to manage their delays and cancellations despite the disruptions and return to […]

Learn More
Brand Strategy, Culture, Design, Digital Media, Strategic Branding
Transforming the Insurance Sector From Laggard to Leader

See related article published on Digital Insurance. While the pandemic took many industries on a rollercoaster ride, few had so many previously set-in-stone strategies, processes and go-to-market gameplans completely upended as the insurance sector. For both established carriers, newer insuretechs, brokers and the multitude of channels in between, no organization was spared the shock of […]

Learn More
Brand Strategy, Corporate Culture, Corporate Responsibility
Who is Responsible for Climate Change?

It’s no secret that the changing climate is one of the most pressing issues facing the rising generations. In a planet already experiencing the consequences of global warming, including increased damage from storms and typhoons, rising water levels, and increased instances of infectious diseases that some experts speculate will bring on the age of pandemics, […]

Learn More
Corporate Culture, Employee Engagement, Employer Branding, Organizational Development
Navigating In-Office and In-Home Workplace Environments to Foster Collaboration and Contentment

The research is clear—employees are more productive and happier in workplace environments that have been intentionally designed to motivate them around a common purpose. From the days of the cubicle to the era of the open plan office, employers have endeavored to develop working environments that help workers engage more productively and find increased fulfillment […]

Learn More

Ready to talk about how your brand and culture can do more for your business?

Let's talk
Let's talk